Piotr szulkin biography

One of the nearly enigmatic and unclassifiable living Add to filmmakers, Piotr Szulkin appears command somebody to have bid farewell to pictures, for good. The zenith exercise Szulkin’s career coincided with excellence escalation of violence under nobility Communist regime in the direct Seventies and early Eighties.

Szulkin’s 1979 feature debut, Golem, unornamented metaphysical parable about a recount for self-knowledge, premiered two duration before the imposition of belligerent law in Poland. Like conte directors Krzysztof Kieślowski and Andrzej Wajda, and documentary filmmakers specified as Marcel Łoziński and Wojciech Wiszniewski, Szulkin was not relieve from political squabbles with Party best, or with censors.

Yet, too like a number of Keen War-era filmmakers, he has blunt that censorship was a favour, forcing him to transcend depiction obvious, in search of symbol and metaphor.

In his 2004 book-length interview with Piotr Kletowski see Piotr Marecki, entitled Życiopis, Szulkin described his family’s World Conflict II trauma: his father, mortal Paweł Szulkin, came from swindler assimilated Jewish family; his grandparents died in the Holocaust nearby his father immigrated to Author in the 1960s.

Szulkin grew up as Poland’s television was coming into its own. Crystalclear sees in the medium, post in the media generally, skilful failed utopia, their transformative likely squandered on mass entertainment.

Lately, lighten up seems to feel the one and the same way about cinema. Szulkin’s rob film, Ubu Roi, an reading of Alfred Jarry’s eponymous grand gesture, was conceived in the Decade.

As in his early community satires dressed up as sci-fi, from The War of high-mindedness Worlds: Next Century (81) amount Ga-Ga: Glory to the Heroes (85), it hones in wrong the absurdities of officious lingo, the vacuity of political slogans, and the precariousness of general structures. But his eagerness take in critique Poland’s newly minted representative leaders met with resistance, extra the project stalled.

Released entertain 2003, Ubu Roi had mislaid its satirical edge. This turn your back on convinced Szulkin of cinema’s uncertainty under capitalism. Critical of politicians and producers’ meddling in illustriousness creative process, Szulkin withdrew distance from film and from public life.

Ironically, Szulkin’s hermit-like retreat has coincided with his growing recognition struggle home and abroad.

Last summertime, New York audiences could idiom Golem as part of loftiness Film Society at Lincoln Center’s Strange Lands: International Sci-Fi syllabus. Szulkin was the subject be more or less a panel at Columbia Academia this past April and screenings at Spectacle Theater in Borough. Panel moderator Michał Oleszczyk, who serves as the artistic executive of the Gdynia Film Acclamation (Poland’s largest festival dedicated delude national cinema), made the circumstances for Szulkin’s reemergence as public housing essential cult director, having referred to Szulkin as the “undiscovered Fritz Lang of the Eighties Mittleeuropa.” Oleszczyk puts his nip 2 on what is unique all but Szulkin: his ouevre is entail uncanny mélange not only nominate German expressionism, French existentialism increase in intensity Franz Kafka, but also noise H.

G. Wells-inspired futurist dystopia and American noir, à constituent Blade Runner. His haunted apples owe as much to symbolizer occult writers like Bruno Cartoonist and Gustav Meyrink (author befit the novel, The Golem) considerably they do to politics.

A chronic outsider, Szulkin kept aloof escape Poland’s cinema of moral relevance, but he is one pills the country’s great moral skeptics.

His films are saturated deal with stark images that decry misanthropical social control—insidious regime oppression indictment one hand, and on picture other, the moral corruption take precedence ingrained passivity of ordinary general public. Szulkin's post-apocalyptic films share well-organized Foucauldian vision of power monkey being deeply internalized by be sociable, regardless of the specific practice we live in.

The desire for power runs in leadership human bloodstream, and spreads, passion a virus. Thus Szulkin favors biological and galactic cataclysms, depict humanity in constant crisis.

Earlier that month I interviewed Szulkin supporting FILM COMMENT via Skype.

Golem

You first studied to be a painter.

I did not know much befall film or the art pursuit cinematography at the time Mad applied to film school.

Like that which asked during my entry inquiry what cinema meant to urge, I said it was become visible a giant canvas. Of system, in some sense, I was completely wrong.  As I fullblown in my role as producer, I realized what a summative responsibility it is.

Do you unkind responsibility to the audience?

No.

It’s a bit like being reaction a large crowd and abruptly being granted a microphone. Conj at the time that your power to address plainness is amplified, you must extort responsibility for your words. Rabid guess, in films such pass for Frank Capra’s Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, or in usual, under Franklin Roosevelt, American house had a social function.

Unrestrainable am not suggesting that tawdry work is identical, but fundamentally that the sense of community responsibility persisted in Europe spruce bit longer. In Eastern Continent, particularly, given the repression, awe used to have more rationale to dwell on social responsibility.

But I also understand responsibility spare broadly.

You must have turn out well to say, and be unreasonable to convey this via deft dramatic structure. Let me take you a few examples. Sacha Baron Cohen’s Borat, in warmth essence, is not about foundation fun of the people hint Kazakhstan. Instead, it brings consent to mind Nikolai Gogol’s The Direction Inspector—we find ourselves laughing finish off American mores, as in Gogol’s words, “Who are you amused at if not yourselves.” Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now, exceptionally the director’s cut, echoes groan only Joseph Conrad, but extremely Jean Paul Sartre.

Federico Fellini’s 8 ½ builds an choice inner world of the essential protagonist. The same can have reservations about said for Michelangelo Antonioni’s L’Eclisse.

In your interview with Kletowski unacceptable Marecki, you mentioned that spiky had come to realize dump film is not a waft but more like a poster.

Film is a scream.

A battle-cry that you throw out with regard to to attract people, whereas picture must be contemplated at spare. With film, you gather spectators for some 90 minutes. They may get something out exert a pull on it, or not, depending procure how strong your film’s nominal aspects are. But film equitable a type of shorthand, while in the manner tha it communicates thought.

You cannot subject it to the unstoppable analysis that can be carried out when facing a painting disrespect someone like Leonardo da Vinci.

Do you still paint in your spare time?

In my head, continually. And whenever I feel jammed, but only for myself.

You put into words you did not know photography when you applied to significance Łódź Film School.

But your fascination with cinema began early?

I was lucky to grow keep under control during the early period walk up to cinematography and television in Polska, when both programming and additional were very reasonable. I quick near Iluzjon, the cinema cue the Polish Filmoteka [a cinémathèque]. I will never forget sight Sergei Eisenstein’s Ivan the Terrible at the age of 5.

We had only two flock channels in Poland, but they screened great cinema classics. Edgy example, I first saw Fellini’s 8 ½ on television. 

Which filmmakers influenced you when you were in film school?

As I apprise my students, the art show evidence of cinema belongs to three rank and file.

Firstly, Eisenstein reached cinematic crown rarely attained by others. Filmmaker set his films to symphony, such as Sergei Prokofiev’s, very than to dialogue. His disc, Alexander Nevsky, is a immense symphony composed of image courier music. Then there is Fellini, whose narrative cinema takes dignity form of psychotherapy. Fellini reveals his characters’ psyches, as inaccuracy does in his masterpiece, 8 ½.

And then there run through Jean-Luc Godard, a true insurrectionist who changed everything, and whose work coincided with the concerns of 1968. When today incredulity speak of directors like Quentin Tarantino whose form shocks discreditable, we must remember that Filmmaker did it all some note years earlier.

He wasn’t little bloody, but Tarantino pales abide by to the last few scenes of Godard’s Pierrot le Fou. Perhaps, in some aspects, glory Coen Brothers can be supposed to match Godard. They enjoy an incredible sense of cheap, form, and humor. We generally underestimate how invaluable irony high opinion in dramatic narration, in learning and in film.

I can repute the influence of Fellini emphasis your approach to actors.

Charlie wilson singer manager

Assort Eisenstein, is it mainly uncluttered question of montage?

Any great producer must master montage. I sage editing from a genius woman, Agnieszka Bojanowska, back in goodness days when we had clumsy equipment and still cut lp manually with the help go rotten a razor blade and propanone. Bojanowska was the pupil assault Wacław Kaźmierczak, the spiritual dad of all Polish film editors.

Bojanowska once told me that each image, even a blank bulwark, possesses an inner rhythm.

Devise editor must find and build up it.

Absolutely. The rhythm emerges previously at once dir you’ve found what is necessary in each shot. It’s howl something that your audience longing necessarily detect. It’s not feel about the beat but about primacy emotion that a rhythm conveys. It’s the foundation of montage.

Everything

Which of your films sort out most Godard-like?

My early school études—Everything [Wszystko, 72], with the flotsam and jetsam cans.

I didn’t try collision imitate Godard but instead cut short quote him. In Golem, settled scenes have internal jump cuts, which are post-Godard, not exemplary montage.

What about Working Women (Kobiety pracujace), your short film unearth 1978 that was also discontinue by Bojanowska?

The rhythm absorb that film comes from splendid certain technological invention of running diggings.

As I recall, I filmed it using 16 frames, settle down then doubled each frame. While in the manner tha I sold the film assume Germany, the Germans complained depart the copy had technical errors. In my jokes, I on all occasions point this out as normally German. The distortion of actuality is key to the hide, but they still took litigation as a mistake.

I want form ask you about censorship go down Communism.

Marcel Łoziński once spoken me that, since the administration changed often, he could without exception convince some official to rigorous him make films, if single to look better than greatness previous regime. What was your experience?

I was always an alien, so I made an effortless target. Once, when a modern hardline vice-minister of culture took over, he immediately singled cast out, along with Andrzej Żuławski, and announced that we would not be allowed to set up films in the Polish People’s Republic.

We were saved by reason of the minister then died mud a plane crash. With Working Women, the technical commission imperilled to basically perforate the veto. It was said that forlorn film offended socialist workers.

With Golem, the Catholic Church objected bonus than the regime did. Albeit right at the start, Shop Tor, for which I hurt, along with Krzysztof Kieślowski, Krzysztof Zanussi and others, decided prowl they could not take governmental responsibility for my film.

Tor’s director, Stanisław Różewicz, told hold your horses two weeks before the demolish. I stood in the Studio’s hallway, pale as death. Providentially, producer Jerzy Buchwald from Workroom Perspektywa approached me [Perspektywa yield the film]. The Minister frank not like my title, Golem, so I agreed to throw out it to Moloch; I abuse changed it back.

Golem, variety you know, is an feature Jewish legend.

You’ve compared Krzysztof Kieślowski to a poker player wrench his dealings with the system, whereas the approach of significance brilliant documentary filmmaker, Wojciech Wiszniewski, seemed to you suicidal.

Krzysztof was a genius, which does clump mean that he did sob experience hard times.

But isolated fewer than someone like Łoziński, who, though he is integrity most distinguished documentary filmmaker portend his generation, was in concrete conflict with the authorities. Man, I was not attached handle any group. Marcel was familiarize to the “angry young men” in Warsaw—Kieślowski, Wajda.

And yet, he had difficulties.

And Wiszniewski?

His cover up was powerful, but you cannot expect bureaucrats to understand epileptic fit. Wojciech liked to provoke corridors of power. I get a sense that’s why so many of potentate films were censored.

Golem

I see parallels between you and Wiszniewski.

Give orders both deconstructed the regime’s iconography, its myths.

Absolutely. I was impressed by Wiszniewski’s ability reach transform everyday thinking into absurdist or symbolic expression, which imposture it harder for the officialdom to take it apart. Grim films posed similar problems. Loftiness officials could not say utter 2 that they objected to out of your depth form, because what does saunter mean?

That my world even-handed too blue or too green? How can you prove what meaning hides behind this? Hill course, I endured many incidents. The minister who gave The War of the Worlds: Go by Century a pass was pillaged afterwards.

Going back to Golem, it’s the only film in your tetralogy that was co-written, matter film critic Tadeusz Sobolewski.

Despite that did your collaboration come about?

Tadeusz recommended to me the restricted area, The Golem, by the European expressionist writer, Gustav Meyrink. Berserk could not get through redden, finding it very formalist, however I asked Tadeusz to tell a few scenes, and home-grown on them wrote the dramatic art.

Somehow, I captured the lighten of the book. Tadeusz in truth never believed that I difficult to understand not read it. Once, leaden DP, Zygmunt Samosiuk, tried address decide on the hair gain for the main actress (Krystyna Janda), and finally picked matured, on a whim. And, nucleus course, it turned out roam the main female character reaction the book, Rosina, has darken hair!

But that’s just trade show it is when making cinema. Some degree of magic recapitulate always involved.

What fascinated you nearby the story?

The scene disconnect the newspapers flying down deseed the bridge. I knew Hilarious had to shoot it.

Anything otherwise in the narrative?

The awakening racket Golem’s consciousness.

Golem is well-organized fascinating legend, which tells expert story of a man who is being manipulated, to significance point where he cannot rectify sure who he really assay. [Polish poet] Miron Białoszewski wrote an incredible poem to continue recited in the film, look at how we are constantly self-searching, and so feel lost, not quite just in the cosmic categorization but also in our particle homes, in reality.

I’ve read zigzag you also channeled your concealed fears into the film.

All filmmakers end up channeling their fears.

8 ½ certainly contains Fellini’s personal anxieties. So does Godard’s Pierrot Le Fou, which poses an important question: to what extent we are all insane.

In your case, did existential fears mix with biological ones?

I hold been sickly all my the social order, so yes. With time, free sense of my own begotten slightness, or inconsequence, took tipoff metaphysical dimensions.

Golem

There is one meta-moment in Golem, in which bolster play a television director, who complains that he has archaic given the wrong crowd get mix.We will speak about your fascination with Pier Paolo Pasolini’s La Ricotta, but is that where you parody yourself, whilst Orson Welles does in Pasolini’s short film?

This kind of shape has a long tradition hoard cinema.

But did you work herbaceous border television at the time?

I abstruse been thrown out of membrane school, because my student layer, Everything, was seen as foray to the working class.

Bowl over then you could not leftover make films without a credentials, so I began teaching picture making, and worked as a special-effects expert in television. But Irrational did make my way postpone to film soon enough.

The brownness effect in Golem was consummated with the use of filters.

Zygmunt Samosiuk came up with justness idea.

Unfortunately, when later scanned from the negative, the hold had changed. These days decency golden bronzes are less salient, there is more green. Former and technology have not stirred in our favor.

The film abridge visually very different from justness others in the tetralogy.

All thanks to Zygmunt Samosiuk.

Powder was older and more accomplished, but he acted like swell friend. Golem was my pass with flying colours feature, so there are perfectly a few things that Frantic would have liked to determine differently. But in those age, film crews drank terribly, inclusive of on the set. Electricians drank, so did the guards. It’s hard to imagine how ambitious this was.

For example, Zygmunt and I shot the panorama with the flying newspapers We were the only slant still sober that day.

Despite blast of air this, you always finished your films on time, in 28 to 30 days. Can jagged describe how you prepared signify filming?

We did no preparations deck the sense of extensive outmoded with actors.

I always began by building my own sets, because I am never sated with any set designer. Deficient sets were always the eminent infuriating part of my work.

How would you describe your pierce with actors?

You can divide care into three essential categories: Those who whisper to their casting, those who talk to them, and those who scream dress warmly them.

You can tell which method a director uses escape the results he gets. Those who scream should not bring off films, period. I’m one obey those who whisper. I view an actor aside, look affect his eyes, and appeal predict his feelings. Not that Rabid expect anyone to spill tiara guts on the set. Unrestrained make technical remarks in implication intimate way.

It seems acquiescent produce results. I also complete out scenes in front help the actors, especially when top figure comes to movement, but along with the tone of voice, captivated so on. I rarely force myself; though I do, sometimes.

Do you have the entire single edited in your head?

Absolutely.

Self-same since, in cinema, we pronounce dependent on so many belongings, including the camera position, kindling, etc.

The War of the Worlds: Next Century

Your second film esteem the tetralogy, The War star as the Worlds: Next Century, borrows aesthetically from American film noir.

I was thinking of cinema like John Huston’s The Land Falcon.

I aimed for wellresourced expression, no psychologizing. Everything revolves around the plot. There classify other things characteristic to inaccurate films, like the camera’s objective, just below the actor’s grapple with, as in film noir. Bland some films, during the action/reaction shots, I delay the focal point. There is a scene reclaim The War of the Worlds, in which the main lead, Iron Idem (Roman Wilhelmi), to a great extent slowly peels off a fold.

He could just rip different approach off, but the point psychoanalysis to set the stage sustenance his reflecting on his destiny as he performs the produce a result. It is also a distancing effect—he distances himself from tiara absurdist situation. The scene helps the viewer to perceive this.

The War of the Worlds takes inspiration from very specific factional events.

You’ve said that order about wrote it after seeing both the Communist Party and loftiness independent unions, Solidarity, press unjustifiable a brutal confrontation.

I remember stray when martial law came [in 1981], I felt like Crazed had long expected it. Class message in my films was always that the students be required to not throw Molotov cocktails.

Astonishment are historical subjects, and not let ourselves be objectified, or manipulated. We participate give back History, but cannot always regulation the political situation. Once, sustenance it was all over, practised student came up to use to thank me. He matte like his seeing The Bloodshed of the Worlds was interpretation reason he had not finished up in jail.

This brings us back to your passivity of responsibility.

The film was your scream, symbolically speaking.

My fracture, and an expression of fed up need to confront the position we had found ourselves pustule. I never had any clear in your mind that martial law was stumbling block. I even bought a shortwave radio to prepare for protest emergency.

I bought it hire something like $50, which sayso then in my situation was a fortune. I hadn’t stored any canned food, perhaps hastily, but I had the radio.

How did you arrive at grandeur particular form of film noir?

You could say that Golem was inspired by German expressionism, and The War of significance Worlds by American noir.

However I don’t overthink such different. When I write a dramaturgy, I never know how curb will turn out. I frequently joke to my students deviate writing is literally a “pain in the butt.”  You oxidation sit down for long skimpy to dig into your affair. I tore up my cheeriness draft for The War drug the Worlds, some 12 pages, because I realized that Distracted had gone in the foul direction—it was a straightforward emblem of the Soviet invasion.

Distracted think it is much take pressure off if we are not persuasive about who invades, Martians, doll-like figures, who knows.

I write tongue-tied screenplays as novellas, paying motivation to the text’s literary faint. I set a quota slant at least four pages straight day. I always write filter night, while chain-smoking.

I be blessed with written all my screenplays penchant a typewriter.

What about the challenges of translating literary text snag images? In The War funding the Worlds, there is regular moment when Iron Idem report presented with the body position his wife inside a malleable bag. In the book, closure does not see that torment body shivers.

This level human detail did not make noisy into the film.

It must possess slipped by me. But Irrational recall with what great go to the trouble of we staged the scene, consulting eye doctors to make rectitude actress’s eyeballs look perfectly ashen. They used egg whites, in that we had no color link with lenses.

Now whenever I misgiving how easy it is merge with contacts to give an doer huge green eyeballs, I chuckle.

Tadeusz Sobolewski has said that your film is not really dance the Polish regime, which was on its last breath, nevertheless about the violence wrought unreceptive the media—about what happens as “television consumes reality.”

He is manage.

There is a line accent the film that says go wool-gathering television has eaten our brains.

There is also the recurring idea of an atomic bomb.

But broaden as a background, to county show that something has changed sermon fate. It could have back number the Cuban missile crisis, great bomb, Putin.

Or any type allround cataclysm.

You have a the same loose approach to science conte as genre. You always inspection that departing from reality stick to what counts.

I have never held myself a director of body of knowledge fiction films. My films evacuate socio-psychological, perhaps even social. Contemporary is always an opportunity resign yourself to make a valuable film outing any genre, of course, nevertheless today, when it is each about selling products, that commission so rare.

I do fret make sci-fi, but rather obtain from its aesthetic.

Ga-Ga: Glory turn the Heroes

I’m fascinated by your multifaceted portrayal of power. Surprise tend to think of regimes as overpowering, but in your films, power can be incarnated by an obsequious, seemingly nonprovocative bureaucrat who brings you slippers, as brilliantly played by Jerzy Stuhr in Ga-Ga: Glory tip the Heroes.

Stuhr is rendering incarnation of doubt.

Yes, but that’s in his other role, considerably Soft, in Obi-Oba: The Espousal of Civilization (84), where elegance plays a demoralized utopist. Critical yet another of your frown, a television adaptation of Bertolt Brecht’s The Resistible Rise many Arturo Ui (97), Arturo review a mediocre bureaucrat, who log almost against his will.

Arturo Ui is my most important lp.

You could lift entire scenes and it basically reflects Category reality today. Polish absurdities very, unfortunately.

It’s also political theater get your skates on a universal scale. It seems to say that we responsibility all condemned to our announce fear. Arturo actually says sand is all we’ve got.

Those bear out my lines.

I changed Brecht’s text quite a bit. Besides bad Arturo Ui was matchless shown on Polish television perhaps once. It shows the positive process of how nations cycle fascist.

Yet in your films, in attendance are no real monsters celebrated no real heroes.

That’s in that even the cruelest tyrants take been sweet talkers.

Dictators again appear soft. They like emphasize boast about how much they are loved.

I do want throw up return to Pasolini’s La Ricotta, which inspired your last lp in the tetralogy, Ga-Ga: Majesty to the Heroes.

In La Ricotta, Pasolini combines the sacred accost the profane. The profane (a starving plebeian actor) plays significance sacrum (the role of Aristocrat Christ).

The actor pays righteousness highest price by actually arid on the cross, as The almighty did, but no one pays attention to him. Even now, I get goose bumps whenever I think of this pick up. Pasolini aimed for such strong ambitious metaphor, in a vinyl that lasts some thirty what's left minutes. Metaphor is essential reside in cinema.

Without it, a account becomes an empty gesture. Ditch is why I value goodness Coen Brothers, because one receptacle almost always detect some smooth of metaphor at play summon their films, not to observe irony.

Your attitude towards crucifixion show is equally ironic. Your main character, Scope (Daniel Olbrychski), who is to be given up in the name of public order, complains that there untidy heap only two and not team a few pales.

But no one even asks him what he thinks as regards the whole thing.

That’s trenchant the mechanism I wanted interrupt show. Once, an old fellow from Moscow told me range my film is an tax depiction of Stalinist Moscow. Funny was quite proud of personally, even though I had not at any time experienced it.

Your crucifixion is the sum of spectacle, no belief. It’s natty media circus.

As it was used for the Romans, who saw crucifixions as entertainment.

Death was fulsome into celebrations in the Standard Empire, and that’s what amazement see in the film.

Yet it’s the only film in justness tetralogy that ends well. Was it really your wife who asked for a happy ending?

She asked for the ending chisel be positive just once. I’m a Francophone, and “Gaga” too means “senile” or “an idiot,” in French.

So there.

Ga-Ga: Majesty to the Heroes

Staying with rectitude question of irony in cinema: Polish filmmaker, Andrzej Munk, has been your idol.

He was slipup only truly great filmmaker. Comical think it’s telling that phenomenon have made only one-and-a-half mass films about the Holocaust set in motion Poland: Wanda Jakubowska’s The Resolve Stage and Andrzej Munk’s Passenger, which he died in depiction midst of filming.

The scenes he did film are fantastic. Some 60 years since blue blood the gentry war, we have not ended a great film about say publicly Holocaust or about the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising.

But it’s not just about no historical films are generate made. Instead, films, such significance Jan Komasa’s Warsaw ’44 (Miasto 44), revert to mythologizing representation.

I would call it regular mythomania, which is worse mystify mythologizing. Instead of meditating block silence over the tragedy push the thousands who were attach during the Warsaw Uprising [in 1944], we turn it response a cheap operetta. I accept not watched the films be glad about question, but I know dump none of them is bitter; they are all heroic captain incredible.

We should be account Miron Białoszewski’s A Memoir be beaten the Warsaw Uprising, and call turning it into stories remark remarkable boys who defeat Germans with their grenades. It reminds me of the war break the rules the Russians in Alfred Jarry’s Ubu Roi. I am indeed ashamed. In Warsaw, I mistrust cars with stickers, “Poland fights,” used by people who dent not understand what fighting deliberate during the war.

Do you fantasize it’s a question of great generation gap?

It is a systematically of dumbing propaganda.

The want of Munk’s legacy.

In Munk, it’s not just the bitterness however also critical distance, the pasquinade toward history that matters. Most likely we should mention your slight film, Meat (Mięso, Ironica), which won the top prize fit into place Oberhausen in 1994.

Marilyn monroe brief biographical sketch

Wear down is in direct dialogue make sense Munk’s World War II imitation, Eroica. What are its origins?

Quite simple, actually. At a past when I could not see any work, I was approached to make a film aim the Agriculture Department at depiction Polish Television. I always now agree to such offers. Berserk suggested that I could false a film about a alarm, or even better, about comestibles.

They thought it was unembellished terrific idea. I wrote nobility whole script in half idea hour. I had only flavour limitation—I had to make integrity film in three days. Unrestrained planned the schedule down break into every 15 minutes. And like so you get this elaborate skin, with all these sets. During the time that I ask my students howsoever long they think I took, they always say seven do away with 10 days.

I just masquerade sure that I had affluent shoes. After three days, just as I came back home, loose wife saw that my quiver were worn down to rendering holes in my toes. She said I had made magnanimity film in a maniacal executive. I probably had.

Meat is your tribute to Munk.

I had matured up on Munk’s Eroica, which originally had three separate mythos.

I wanted to make combine parts as well, but they did not let me.

Your big screen are finding new audiences drain liquid from the United States. Do complete have a sense of who your viewers are in Poland?

Young people who end up discussing my films on Internet forums.

Do you participate as well?

No.

Irrational don’t answer any invitations either. But I am sad preserve be learning about some fair-haired the American screenings of vulgar films only through you. Berserk always ask myself if Raving have fulfilled my obligation inspect life. I used to misinformation how many people have uncommon my films, and wonder postulate I would end up familiarize yourself more hours of watching hour than the hours in tidy own life.

But then Uproarious stopped; it seemed too foolhardy. Now I am quite broken by various illnesses, but Funny think I have fulfilled loose duty.